AI Recruiting Sourcing Assistant
Build shortlists for hard-to-fill roles, with each candidate's fit against the brief written out.
$200–$10,000+
$0–$300
5–15 hrs/week
2–6 weeks
7 / 10
High
Overview
Sourcing is the slowest part of recruiting and the part staffing agencies routinely overcharge for — this builds shortlists for hard-to-fill roles with each candidate's fit against the brief written out explicitly using ChatGPT, Claude and LinkedIn Recruiter. A ranked list with no reasoning attached is unusable to a hiring manager; showing the reasoning is what lets them actually argue with (and trust) the shortlist. Sold per-unit or on retainer to recruiters and staffing firms.
Why it works
Sourcing is the slowest part of recruiting and the part agencies overcharge for, and screening reasoning shown explicitly is what a hiring manager can actually argue with - a ranked list without reasons is unusable.
How it makes money
Per deliverable + retainer
How to start
- Choose a role family you can assess: backend engineering, finance, clinical.
- Take a proper brief - the must-haves, the nice-to-haves, and what the manager will actually reject on.
- Build the search strings for LinkedIn Recruiter, including the adjacent titles.
- Screen against the brief and write one line per candidate on why they fit.
- Use Claude to summarise profiles, not to judge them - screening on AI inference is where bias enters.
- Never filter on anything that proxies a protected characteristic, and keep the audit trail.
- Deliver a shortlist of ten with the reasoning visible, not a spreadsheet of two hundred.
- Include the ones you rejected and why, which is what shows the search was thorough.
- Agree data handling in writing before touching candidate information.
- Charge for sourcing per role rather than a placement percentage.
- Track which shortlists led to hires and tighten the brief accordingly.
Tags
- recruiting
- recruiters
- per-search
- chatgpt
Last verified 2026-08-21
Suggest an updateFound this useful? Share it